Actually testosterone has been linked to protect dogs against cancer in a couple of scientific studies. Also, bone cancer is more common in neutered dogs than in natural dogs. Testicular cancer is a possibility, yes, cancer that actually affects only less than 1% of the males.
Now I am only going to talk about male dogs, since studies on female dogs are usually inconclusive.
On the positive side, neutering male dogs
• eliminates the small risk (probably <1%) of dying from testicular cancer
• reduces the risk of non-cancerous prostate disorders
• reduces the risk of perianal fistulas
• may possibly reduce the risk of diabetes (data inconclusive)
On the negative side, neutering male dogs
• if done before 1 year of age, significantly increases the risk of osteosarcoma (bone cancer); this is a common cancer in medium/large and larger breeds with a poor prognosis.
• increases the risk of cardiac hemangiosarcoma by a factor of 1.6
• triples the risk of hypothyroidism
• increases the risk of progressive geriatric cognitive impairment
• triples the risk of obesity, a common health problem in dogs with many associated health problems
• quadruples the small risk (<0.6%) of prostate cancer
• doubles the small risk (<1%) of urinary tract cancers
• increases the risk of orthopedic disorders
• increases the risk of adverse reactions to vaccinations
Now you choose: Do what your "vet" tells you it is best for your pet, or do what science (and not politicians and business owners) tell you about neutering male canines.
If you want to read the study follow the source www.naiaonline.org it is all about population control do not leave your dog abandoned
all day long. I never leave mine, not even for one minute. Neutering is
therefore a bad excuse to practice eugenics at an animal level.There are tons of OPINIONS on the subject but only science can determine which of those opinions are facts or myths. I, personally, opt for science, how about you?
Now I am only going to talk about male dogs, since studies on female dogs are usually inconclusive.
On the positive side, neutering male dogs
• eliminates the small risk (probably <1%) of dying from testicular cancer
• reduces the risk of non-cancerous prostate disorders
• reduces the risk of perianal fistulas
• may possibly reduce the risk of diabetes (data inconclusive)
On the negative side, neutering male dogs
• if done before 1 year of age, significantly increases the risk of osteosarcoma (bone cancer); this is a common cancer in medium/large and larger breeds with a poor prognosis.
• increases the risk of cardiac hemangiosarcoma by a factor of 1.6
• triples the risk of hypothyroidism
• increases the risk of progressive geriatric cognitive impairment
• triples the risk of obesity, a common health problem in dogs with many associated health problems
• quadruples the small risk (<0.6%) of prostate cancer
• doubles the small risk (<1%) of urinary tract cancers
• increases the risk of orthopedic disorders
• increases the risk of adverse reactions to vaccinations
Now you choose: Do what your "vet" tells you it is best for your pet, or do what science (and not politicians and business owners) tell you about neutering male canines.
If you want to read the study follow the source www.naiaonline.org it is all about population control do not leave your dog abandoned
all day long. I never leave mine, not even for one minute. Neutering is
therefore a bad excuse to practice eugenics at an animal level.There are tons of OPINIONS on the subject but only science can determine which of those opinions are facts or myths. I, personally, opt for science, how about you?